Explore all industries
Browse the industries where Zixel is most often used to connect design review, change control, service delivery, and downstream enablement.
View industries
Who this is a good fit for
DesignersTechnical directorsEngineering leadsDesign enablement teamsMES operators
Turn repeated size changes, repeated product selection, and experience-based design into reusable rules and online configuration flows.
Common example situations
- Parametric selection and web-based modeling for industrial components
- Parametric package and carton design with MES integration
- Parametric selection and knowledge capture for connectors in automation equipment
You may be running into these problems
If several of these sound familiar, this theme is usually worth reviewing first.
Teams keep redrawing the same product family
Many product variants differ only by a few dimensions or rules, yet teams still rebuild and adjust models manually each time.
Selection rules live in a few people's heads
Connector choice, box sizing, and component specification often depend on a small number of experienced engineers.
Third-party configuration platforms are expensive and limiting
Long-term dependence on external platforms can increase cost while limiting control over the workflow and future integration.
What customers usually ask for
These are the requests that tend to surface early in real conversations.
We want common product variants to come from parameter changes instead of full redesign every time.
We want the system to remember selection rules so newer team members can still reach a stable result.
We want the same parametric capability to connect later to the website, procurement tools, customer configurators, or production systems.
How teams usually roll this out
You do not need a massive transformation on day one. The best first step is usually the part of the workflow that is slowing people down the most.
1
Start with one high-frequency product family
Choose a product line with many size or configuration variants and a high amount of repeated manual explanation.
2
Turn design rules into reusable templates
Define parameters, constraints, naming rules, and assembly logic so the template can produce repeatable results.
3
Configure and preview online
Let users select specifications, drive dimensions, preview the result, and generate the required model or drawing.
4
Push outputs into downstream systems
Send results back to a website catalog, procurement workflow, MES, or PDM so teams stop moving data by hand.
Recommended product mix
You can phase these in over time. Not every module has to go live on the same day.
| Module | What it does in this solution |
|---|---|
| 3D CAD | Supports parametric modeling, template creation, and automatic drawing output. |
| PDM | Manages template versions, rule updates, and configuration results. |
| 3D Viewer | Provides browser-based preview, sharing, and lightweight collaboration. |
| Geometric Search | Helps teams find similar parts and past designs to accelerate template building and reuse. |
Deployment and integration
The right rollout depends on security requirements, the systems you already have, and how many teams need to be involved first.
Deployment options
The capability can start as an internal design tool and later extend into a customer-facing configurator or website entry point.
Integration path
Typical integrations include websites, procurement tools, product catalogs, MES, and internal product databases.
Best place to start
Start with one product family, prove the template and rule model, then expand to more assemblies and variants.
What teams usually see first
Every organization is different, but these are the early changes teams most often notice once the workflow is running.
Repeat design work drops sharply and delivery becomes more predictable.
Design knowledge becomes easier to reuse, which helps newer engineers ramp up faster.
Configuration conversations become clearer, reducing back-and-forth between teams.
Later integration with websites, procurement, or production systems becomes easier to standardize.
Frequently asked questions
If you already have CAD, PLM, MES, ERP, or in-house systems in place, these questions are usually a good place to start.
Is parametric design only suitable for simple parts?
No. Complex parts and assemblies can also become parameter-driven, but teams usually move faster by starting with a product family that already has clear rules.
Will designers feel boxed in by templates?
A good template should remove repeated low-value work, not limit design thinking. It frees designers to spend time on the parts that still need engineering judgment.
Can this connect to production systems later?
Yes. Many teams connect stable parametric outputs into MES, procurement flows, or internal product databases once the template logic is ready.
You may also want to review these themes
If the problem you are solving touches more than one workflow, these pages often go together.
Multi-CAD & Large Models
Multi-CAD & Large Models
Bring models from multiple CAD systems, large-assembly review, online feedback, and version coordination into one practical workflow.
R&D Project & BOM Governance
R&D Project & BOM Governance
Bring projects, BOMs, engineering files, and approval flows back into a trackable, collaborative rhythm.
Want to see how this could fit your team?
Tell us what systems you use today, who needs access, and where the handoff is breaking down. We can help you decide the best place to start.